New article from today's NY Times re: high mercury levels in tuna.
High Mercury Levels Are Found in Tuna Sushi
By Marianne Burrows
New York Times
Recent laboratory tests found so much mercury in tuna sushi from 20 Manhattan stores and restaurants that at most of them, a regular diet of six pieces a week would exceed the levels considered acceptable by the Environmental Protection Agency.
www.nytimes.com/2008/01/23...3sushi.html
High Mercury Levels Are Found in Tuna Sushi
By Marianne Burrows
New York Times
Recent laboratory tests found so much mercury in tuna sushi from 20 Manhattan stores and restaurants that at most of them, a regular diet of six pieces a week would exceed the levels considered acceptable by the Environmental Protection Agency.
www.nytimes.com/2008/01/23...3sushi.html
-
Re: High Mercury Levels Are Found in Tuna Sushi
Thu, January 24, 2008 - 1:52 PMSo sad. I have always assumed the sushi grade sushi had less mercury. Wishful thinking. I still love it. -
-
Re: High Mercury Levels Are Found in Tuna Sushi
Thu, January 24, 2008 - 2:38 PMdoes sushi grade tuna come out of a different ocean than canned tuna? -
-
Re: High Mercury Levels Are Found in Tuna Sushi
Sun, January 27, 2008 - 5:15 PMNo it does not, but I thought maybe the level of quality made a differnce. Like farm raised salmon v. wild. -
-
Re: High Mercury Levels Are Found in Tuna Sushi
Wed, January 30, 2008 - 4:43 PMthis is only for tuna right? please tell me all the other fishes are ok to eat! -
-
Re: Mercury in Tuna
Wed, January 30, 2008 - 5:15 PMWell, on the way home from work tonight I had albacore, bigeye, bluefin and ahi. That's only 4, so I should be fine! lol
I also had hamachi, escalar, salmon-toro and a salmon-skin roll, washed down with miso, green tea and cold sake, with uni for dessert.
Yum!
-
Re: High Mercury Levels Are Found in Tuna Sushi
Thu, January 31, 2008 - 4:35 PMAccording to the Monterey Bay Aquarium's National Seafood Guide (2008), limited consumption of the following species is suggested due to concerns about mercury or other contaminants:
Chilean Seabass/Toothfish
Groupers
Orange Roughy
Farmed Salmon (including Atlantic)
Sharks
Imported Wild Sturgeon Caviar
Imported Swordfish
Longline Albacore, Bigeye & Yellowfin Tuna
Bluefin Tuna
More info at:
www.environmentaldefense.org/page.cfm
www.mbayaq.org/cr/cr_seaf...alGuide.pdf
You can download regional seafood guides here:
www.mbayaq.org/cr/cr_seaf...ownload.asp -
-
Re: High Mercury Levels Are Found in Tuna Sushi
Wed, March 5, 2008 - 10:04 AMThis is nothing new. -
-
Re: High Mercury Levels Are Found in Tuna Sushi
Wed, March 5, 2008 - 6:28 PMHere is a fascinating (and educational) online calculator for finding out the mecury levels, exposure and suggested levels you are allowed to eat. Some of it is nice to know (and a relief - like sake/salmon) others are, well...not such great news!
www.gotmercury.org/
worth a look!
Steve
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Re: High Mercury Levels Are Found in Tuna Sushi
Tue, March 11, 2008 - 7:52 AMThere are 3 kinds of lies. Lies, Damn Lies and Statistics. I have data on Mercury in Salmon (which correlates with the same situation in Tuna) which puts the danger of Mercury consumed in "PERSPECTIVE". It is from the Nutrition Action Healthletter (which "is the largest-circulation health newsletter in North America, providing reliable information on nutrition and health.") This was an excerpt from an article on eating FARMED Salmon which has the HIGHEST levels of Mercury). It shows the risks versus BENEFITS, and the latter outweigh the former! It is from the Pew Oceans Commission, which released a host of recommendations in 2003 to guide the way in which the federal government will successfully manage America’s marine environment. It was aimed at sowing dangers of farmed fish and contaminants but nicely demonstrates the statistics of risk versus reward with eating Salmon (or Tuna) which are such beneficial fish from the Omega-3 standpoint.
RISK OF EATING SALMON FROM MERCURY VS CARDIAC DEATHS
Here’s what the Pew study boils down to: if you eat a six-ounce serving of cooked farmed salmon from Washington state or Chile once a month for your entire life, your risk of getting cancer rises by roughly one in 100,000. Another way to look at it: 33,000 of every 100,000 Americans who live to age 80 will be diagnosed with cancer. If all 100,000 ate farmed salmon from Washington state or Chile (where the contaminants are the highest) once a month, the number of cancer cases would climb by just one, to 33,001.
If they ate the farmed salmon once a week, the number of cases would rise to 33,004 (or to 33,008 if the salmon was farmed in Canada). Compare that relatively small number of additional cancers with the impact of salmon on sudden cardiac death. While there are no exact numbers available, a conservative estimate is that roughly 5,000 out of every 100,000 Americans die of cardiac arrest. If all 100,000 ate salmon (farmed or wild) once a week, researchers estimate that the number of deaths would drop to 3,500. That’s 30 percent fewer lives lost [ or 1,500 lives SAVED]. “Of all the nutrients in our diet, nothing has a greater impact on preventing death from sudden heart attacks than the omega-3 fatty acids in seafood like salmon, [or Tuna]” says William Harris of the University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine. “That’s why the American Heart Association recommends that adults eat fish, particularly fatty fish, at least two times a week.” Clearly, the benefit to the heart from making one of those servings salmon outweighs the increased cancer risk.